Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Predicting Rutting Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures Using Aggregate Shape Parameters

Authors

  • Bakiman Sihotang Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Author
  • Eliana Cafarchia Department of Computer Science, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. Author

Keywords:

physics-informed machine learning; asphalt mixtures; rutting resistance; aggregate shape; pavement engineering; infrastructure governance; sustainability

Abstract

Rutting remains one of the most consequential distress modes in asphalt pavements, affecting safety, ride quality, drainage, and life-cycle cost. Conventional empirical and mechanistic models can predict rutting resistance, but they often struggle to represent the coupled influence of aggregate morphology, binder rheology, mixture gradation, compaction, traffic loading, climate, and construction variability. This paper examines physics-informed machine learning as a system-level strategy for predicting rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures using aggregate shape parameters. The central argument is that aggregate shape is not merely a descriptive input but a meso-structural control variable that conditions contact fabric, interlock, stress distribution, and permanent deformation accumulation. Physics-informed machine learning offers a way to embed mechanical constraints, viscoelastic behavior, conservation principles, and domain knowledge into data-driven models, thereby improving extrapolation, uncertainty awareness, and engineering credibility. The paper discusses the architecture of such systems, including imaging and characterization pipelines, laboratory and field data integration, model training and validation, deployment in pavement management, and governance arrangements. It also considers sustainability, equity, robustness, and policy implications, especially where predictive tools influence material specifications, procurement, and maintenance prioritization. The analysis concludes that physics-informed machine learning can support more resilient and sustainable asphalt infrastructure, but only if technical performance is matched by transparent validation, institutional accountability, and careful attention to the socio-technical conditions of deployment.

References

1. Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440.

2. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.

3. Willard, J., Jia, X., Xu, S., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2022). Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and environmental systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(4), 1–37.

4. Pan, T., Tutumluer, E., & Carpenter, S. H. (2006). Effect of coarse aggregate morphology on permanent deformation behavior of hot mix asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(7), 580–589.

5. Masad, E., Saadeh, S., Al-Rousan, T., Garboczi, E., & Little, D. (2007). Computations of particle surface characteristics using optical and X-ray CT images. Computational Materials Science, 38(3), 495–509.

6. Wang, L., Wang, H., Haberl, A., & Oeser, M. (2015). Effect of aggregate morphology on the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 93, 719–727.

7. Chen, J., Li, H., Wang, L., & Wu, S. (2018). Virtual testing of asphalt mixture with two-dimensional and three-dimensional random aggregate structures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19(10), 915–927.

8. L.W.Shi, Z.Y.Hu, H.M.Huang, et al. Effect of coarse aggregate morphology on asphalt mixture meso‑structure using image recognition technology, Measurement, 2026, 290: 122757.

9. AASHTO. (2020). Standard method of test for determining the rutting susceptibility of asphalt paving mixtures using the Hamburg wheel-tracking device (AASHTO T 324). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

10. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures (NCHRP 1-37A). Transportation Research Board.

11. Bahia, H. U., Hanson, D. I., Zeng, M., Zhai, H., Khatri, M. A., & Anderson, R. M. (2001). Characterization of modified asphalt binders in Superpave mix design (NCHRP Report 459). Transportation Research Board.

12. Airey, G. D. (2003). Rheological properties of styrene butadiene styrene polymer modified road bitumens. Fuel, 82(14), 1709–1719.

13. Tarefder, R. A., & Zaman, M. (2010). Neural network modeling of rutting potential of asphalt pavements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(11), 1104–1112.

14. Kutay, M. E., Arambula, E., Gibson, N., & Youtcheff, J. (2011). Use of artificial neural networks to predict dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 2210(1), 93–100.

15. Gopalakrishnan, K., Ceylan, H., & Attoh-Okine, N. (2017). Intelligent and soft computing systems for pavement engineering. Springer.

16. Kim, Y. R., & Little, D. N. (2004). Linear viscoelastic analysis of asphalt mastics. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 16(2), 122–132.

17. Little, D. N., & Jones, D. R. (2003). Chemical and mechanical processes of moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1829(1), 20–28.

18. Molenaar, A. A. A. (2000). Rutting of asphalt pavements. In Proceedings of the 2nd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress (pp. 1–10). European Asphalt Pavement Association.

19. Wang, H., Huang, X., & Chen, J. (2020). Review of aggregate shape characterization and its application in asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 237, 117600.

20. Zhang, Y., & Luo, R. (2020). An overview of machine learning in asphalt pavement engineering. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7(4), 491–507.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-22